<< Back to Hoppa International
Privileged and
Confidential
Extremely Confidential/Top
secret
The Clean/Dank
Spectrum
And managing the
“sweet spot” threshold and the implications for
business and product strategy at all scales
Reference Threshold model for
considering cleanliness and dankness
- Clean and dank are like
yin/yang, strong opposing forces ⚫️
⚪️
- Starting point, direction,
speed, everything matters
- The sweet spot (a.k.a.
“👌”) is defined as the central point on
the clean/dank spectrum. Much like the heisenberg uncertainty principle it is
impossible to know both the location of an object on the spectrum
AND the speed and direction of that object[a]. We should also refer to this as the Hoppa Uncertainty Principle[b][c]. That is to say, that you can
see exactly where something is on the clean/dank spectrum, but you
do not know where it will be in the future. It requires constant
observation and rebalancing.
- For any company or product,
constant observation is required to observe the position on the
spectrum, and thus a constant evaluation of the direction of the
company or product is required to remain in the sweet spot
threshold.
- To what extent is
approaching the sweet spot asymptotic?
- Self-awareness is inversely
proportional to the size of the organization
- Changing direction requires
defining a new origin point on the spectrum
- The sweet spot is a
constantly moving target
- Thus the ideal approach is to
detect the appropriate direction and speed, as such that you always
stay in consistent distance from the sweet-spot, albeit never fully
reaching it[d]
- Vector is unidirectional and
cannot be reversed in any instance
- There is a point of no
return once you cross the sweet spot -- the event
horizon.
- Unpredictability vs.
consistency
Charting
the spectrum:
[e]
Notes on the
spectrum:
- For any given spectrum, you
can identify optimal zone of
opportunity
- Depending on the gradient of
spectrum will determine the ideal level of clean and
dank.
- In many cases, it could be
that more cleanliness is appropriate than dankness, and vice versa.
It depends on the gradient on the curve
Example Vector:
[f]
The third dimension in this
instance is time, which is critical in determining the speed of a
given vector on the spectrum
New
developments in this theory
Stankness (as discovered by
Elon) itself is actually
a key point on the spectrum, as it gives dank something to be
related to. Dankness in and of itself may actually be the sweet
spot. At least this point in time
Quote
from Toby Shorin
“Between the zone of normalcy and the zone of experimentation,
there is a sweet spot[g]. Just outside what is considered normal yet familiar enough
to be comprehended, this is where good marketers work. When Weiden
Kennedy says they want to capture “lightning
in a bottle” this is what they
mean: to take something just outside of mainstream culture,
aestheticize it, and turn it into marketing for a consumer product.
It doesn’t matter how much of a commodity the product
is—this works for makeup and sneakers as well as it does for
high-performance cars.”
System
thresholds
Building upon the stability
principles (Fig. 1), we define the system thresholds (Fig.
2).
It is therefore imperative to know
where the hump begins, so that you can carefully calibrate your
speed and direction, such that you avoid falling into the
valley.
Similarities to black holes: ensuring you do not pass the
point on staleness.
Once you progress towards
cleanliness, it is impossible to return to dankness. You can only
move in one direction.
[a]+kryg
+slov
this is a discovery
[d]Hypothesis needs
confirming
[f]what would the 3rd dimension be in
our instance?
[g]"sweet spot" is a previously
discussed phenomenon